Editorial standards

Every page starts from primary sources: peer-reviewed trials, FDA records, the Federal Register, and National Library of Medicine labeling. Claims are drafted against those sources, each factual claim is tied to a specific citation in a machine-readable ledger published at /evidence.json, and automated checks verify that every citation URL resolves before a page ships.

We are equally explicit about what our process is not: no physician or clinician has reviewed this content, and we do not display reviewer credentials we do not have. Sermorelin pages name their evidence, grade it by study type and species, and let you open every source yourself.

We cite peer-reviewed journals, government agencies (FDA, NIH, the Federal Register), and official drug labeling. On this site's sermorelin monograph, every study row carries a species label (human, rat, mouse, in vitro), because conflating animal and human findings is the signature failure of peptide marketing. Vendor blogs, testimonials, and supplement-industry content are not citable sources here. Where sermorelin evidence is absent, we say so rather than borrowing growth hormone data and hoping nobody notices.

Every page shows its published and updated dates. We re-verify status-dependent claims against FDA sources when the regulatory record changes, and the sermorelin evidence brief exists precisely to log those changes. Material updates change the visible updated date; silent rewrites are not something we do.

If you find an error on any Sermorelin Co page, including a citation that does not support its claim, reply to any edition of our email brief or use the contact route on our privacy page. Replies are read. Verified factual corrections are applied to the page, and the updated date reflects the change. We treat a demonstrated citation error as the most serious defect this site can have.